The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a triennial world-wide test of 15-year-old school children's scholastic performance, the implementation of which is coordinated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
The aim of the PISA study is to test and compare schoolchildren's performance across the world, with a view to improving educational methods and outcomes.
Here is an overview of the 20 places with the highest scores in 2006:
Mathematics |
Science |
Reading |
|
---|---|---|---|
1. |
Taiwan |
Finland |
South Korea |
2. |
Finland |
Hong Kong |
Finland |
3. |
Hong Kong |
Canada |
Hong Kong |
4. |
South Korea |
Taiwan |
Canada |
5. |
Netherlands |
Estonia |
New Zealand |
6. |
Switzerland |
Japan |
Ireland |
7. |
Canada |
New Zealand |
Australia |
8. |
Macau |
Australia |
Liechtenstein |
9. |
Liechtenstein |
Netherlands |
Poland |
10. |
Japan |
Liechtenstein |
Sweden |
11. |
New Zealand |
South Korea |
Netherlands |
12. |
Belgium |
Slovenia |
Belgium |
13. |
Australia |
Germany |
Estonia |
14. |
Estonia |
United Kingdom |
Switzerland |
15. |
Denmark |
Czech Republic |
Japan |
16. |
Czech Republic |
Switzerland |
Taiwan |
17. |
Iceland |
Macau |
United Kingdom |
18. |
Austria |
Austria |
Germany |
19. |
Slovenia |
Belgium |
Denmark |
20. |
Germany |
Ireland |
Slovenia |
Excerpt from a commentary on the above results - at http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/12/thats-pretty-pathetic.html
Asia-Pacific’s strong showing is one of the clearest themes of the Pisa survey, which was carried out in 57 countries that account for 90 per cent of the world gross domestic product. The region contributes five of the top 10 in the mathematics and science league tables, and four of the top 10 in reading – thanks to strong contributions from Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Macao, Australia and New Zealand. Mainland China did not participate.
But the league tables show Finland is the most consistently high performer – repeating its sterling performance in the last survey in 2003. It comes top in science, and second in maths and in reading – where it is bested only by South Korea.
The US, the world’s largest economy, is below the OECD average in science and maths, and fails even to make the tables in reading because a misprint in the test confused too many students and invalidated the results.
Makes you proud to be an American, doesn't it?
PISA 2006 results by score and standard deviation
|
science |
math |
|
reading |
||
|
Mean |
S.D. |
Mean |
S.D. |
Mean |
S.D. |
OECD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
527 |
100 |
520 |
88 |
513 |
94 |
Austria |
511 |
98 |
505 |
98 |
490 |
108 |
Belgium |
510 |
100 |
520 |
106 |
501 |
110 |
Canada |
534 |
94 |
527 |
86 |
527 |
96 |
Czech Republic |
513 |
98 |
510 |
103 |
483 |
111 |
Denmark |
496 |
93 |
513 |
85 |
494 |
89 |
Finland |
563 |
86 |
548 |
81 |
547 |
81 |
France |
495 |
102 |
496 |
96 |
488 |
104 |
Germany |
516 |
100 |
504 |
99 |
495 |
112 |
Greece |
473 |
92 |
459 |
92 |
460 |
103 |
Hungary |
504 |
88 |
491 |
91 |
482 |
94 |
Iceland |
491 |
97 |
506 |
88 |
484 |
97 |
Ireland |
508 |
94 |
501 |
82 |
517 |
92 |
Italy |
475 |
96 |
462 |
96 |
469 |
109 |
Japan |
531 |
100 |
523 |
91 |
498 |
102 |
Korea |
522 |
90 |
547 |
93 |
556 |
88 |
Luxembourg |
486 |
97 |
490 |
93 |
479 |
100 |
Mexico |
410 |
81 |
406 |
85 |
410 |
96 |
Netherlands |
525 |
96 |
531 |
89 |
507 |
97 |
New Zealand |
530 |
107 |
522 |
93 |
521 |
105 |
Norway |
487 |
96 |
490 |
92 |
484 |
105 |
Poland |
498 |
90 |
495 |
87 |
508 |
100 |
Portugal |
474 |
89 |
466 |
91 |
472 |
99 |
Slovak Republic |
488 |
93 |
492 |
95 |
466 |
105 |
Spain |
488 |
91 |
480 |
89 |
461 |
89 |
Sweden |
503 |
94 |
502 |
90 |
507 |
98 |
Switzerland |
512 |
99 |
530 |
97 |
499 |
94 |
Turkey |
424 |
83 |
424 |
93 |
447 |
93 |
United Kingdom |
515 |
107 |
495 |
89 |
495 |
102 |
United States |
489 |
106 |
474 |
90 |
m |
m |
OECD total |
491 |
104 |
484 |
98 |
484 |
107 |
OECD average |
500 |
95 |
498 |
92 |
492 |
99 |
Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
391 |
101 |
381 |
101 |
374 |
124 |
Azerbaijan |
382 |
56 |
476 |
48 |
353 |
70 |
Brazil |
390 |
89 |
370 |
92 |
393 |
102 |
Bulgaria |
434 |
107 |
413 |
101 |
402 |
118 |
Chile |
438 |
92 |
411 |
87 |
442 |
103 |
Colombia |
388 |
85 |
370 |
88 |
385 |
108 |
Croatia |
493 |
86 |
467 |
83 |
477 |
89 |
Estonia |
531 |
84 |
515 |
80 |
501 |
85 |
Hong Kong-China |
542 |
92 |
547 |
93 |
536 |
82 |
Indonesia |
393 |
70 |
391 |
80 |
393 |
75 |
Israel |
454 |
111 |
442 |
107 |
439 |
119 |
Jordan |
422 |
90 |
384 |
84 |
401 |
94 |
Kyrgyzstan |
322 |
84 |
311 |
87 |
285 |
102 |
Latvia |
490 |
84 |
486 |
83 |
479 |
91 |
Liechtenstein |
522 |
97 |
525 |
93 |
510 |
95 |
Lithuania |
488 |
90 |
486 |
90 |
470 |
96 |
Macao-China |
511 |
78 |
525 |
84 |
492 |
77 |
Montenegro |
412 |
80 |
399 |
85 |
392 |
90 |
Qatar |
349 |
84 |
318 |
91 |
312 |
109 |
Romania |
418 |
81 |
415 |
84 |
396 |
92 |
Russian Federation |
479 |
90 |
476 |
90 |
440 |
93 |
Serbia |
436 |
85 |
435 |
92 |
401 |
92 |
Slovenia |
519 |
98 |
504 |
89 |
494 |
88 |
Chinese Taipei |
532 |
94 |
549 |
103 |
496 |
84 |
Thailand |
421 |
77 |
417 |
81 |
417 |
82 |
Tunisia |
386 |
82 |
365 |
92 |
380 |
97 |
Uruguay |
428 |
94 |
427 |
99 |
413 |
121 |
According to the PISA 2006 results (above) I calculated the mean scores and the standard variations of 4 East Asian and 13 white countries. I didn’t take China as only the Pacific Rim Chinese are the East Asians, not all the Chinese. I didn’t take US either as there are also blacks and Hispanics. I took only the wealthy white countries (Austria, Canada, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Sweden, Swiss and UK) versus Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan, Hong-Kong.
Whites:
Science sd Math sd Reading sd
511 97 509 93 500 100
E.Asians:
Science sd Math sd Reading sd
532 94 542 95 522 89
If we compare those 13 white countries with the 4 E.Asian countries the whites have lower scores and variances for math.
They have a slightly larger variance in science but are never able to catch the East Asians even at the highest end of the scale.
The reading scores of the whites are significantly lower but their variance is also significantly larger. They are able to catch the East Asians at only 2 sigma which is the equivalent of 130 IQ at sd=15.
Reading correlates more with math than vocabulary. It is also worth seeing the vocabulary scores of the nations but regarding the PISA scores I couldn’t see the famous verbal superiority of the whites against the East Asians. Nothing even close to it! La Griffe Du Lion says in his web site that the whites have 4 points (!) of verbal advantage. Why don’t we see it in the PISA tests?
Deniz
Go to: Average IQ in the US and in 80 other nations
Go to: Causes of IQ differences among races and nations
Go to: Success of Nations - causes besides IQ
Comments to: VanSloan@yahoo.com