PISA 2006 survey
 

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a triennial world-wide test of 15-year-old school children's scholastic performance, the implementation of which is coordinated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

The aim of the PISA study is to test and compare schoolchildren's performance across the world, with a view to improving educational methods and outcomes.

 

Here is an overview of the 20 places with the highest scores in 2006:

Mathematics

Science

Reading

1.

 Taiwan

 Finland

 South Korea

2.

 Finland

 Hong Kong

 Finland

3.

 Hong Kong

 Canada

 Hong Kong

4.

 South Korea

 Taiwan

 Canada

5.

 Netherlands

 Estonia

 New Zealand

6.

 Switzerland

 Japan

 Ireland

7.

 Canada

 New Zealand

 Australia

8.

 Macau

 Australia

 Liechtenstein

9.

 Liechtenstein

 Netherlands

 Poland

10.

 Japan

 Liechtenstein

 Sweden

11.

 New Zealand

 South Korea

 Netherlands

12.

 Belgium

 Slovenia

 Belgium

13.

 Australia

 Germany

 Estonia

14.

 Estonia

 United Kingdom

 Switzerland

15.

 Denmark

 Czech Republic

 Japan

16.

 Czech Republic

 Switzerland

 Taiwan

17.

 Iceland

 Macau

 United Kingdom

18.

 Austria

 Austria

 Germany

19.

 Slovenia

 Belgium

 Denmark

20.

 Germany

 Ireland

 Slovenia

Reactions to the results:   For many countries, the first PISA results were a nasty surprise; in Germany and the United States, for example, the comparatively low scores brought on heated debate about how the school system should be changed. Other countries had an agreeable surprise.

Excerpt from a commentary on the above results - at  http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/12/thats-pretty-pathetic.html   

 
But maybe it all doesn't much matter, since the international test results seem to correlate with Lynn and Vanhanen's IQ scores reasonably well.

Anyway, here's the Financial Times' summary of the 2006 PISA:

 

Asia-Pacific’s strong showing is one of the clearest themes of the Pisa survey, which was carried out in 57 countries that account for 90 per cent of the world gross domestic product. The region contributes five of the top 10 in the mathematics and science league tables, and four of the top 10 in reading – thanks to strong contributions from Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Macao, Australia and New Zealand. Mainland China did not participate.

But the league tables show Finland is the most consistently high performer – repeating its sterling performance in the last survey in 2003. It comes top in science, and second in maths and in reading – where it is bested only by South Korea.

The US, the world’s largest economy, is below the OECD average in science and maths, and fails even to make the tables in reading because a misprint in the test confused too many students and invalidated the results.

 

Makes you proud to be an American, doesn't it?


 

PISA 2006 results by score and standard deviation

 

 

science

math

 

reading

 

Mean

S.D.

Mean

S.D.

Mean

S.D.

OECD

 

 

 

 

 

 

Australia

527

100

520

88

513

94

Austria

511

98

505

98

490

108

Belgium

510

100

520

106

501

110

Canada

534

94

527

86

527

96

Czech Republic

513

98

510

103

483

111

Denmark

496

93

513

85

494

89

Finland

563

86

548

81

547

81

France

495

102

496

96

488

104

Germany

516

100

504

99

495

112

Greece

473

92

459

92

460

103

Hungary

504

88

491

91

482

94

Iceland

491

97

506

88

484

97

Ireland

508

94

501

82

517

92

Italy

475

96

462

96

469

109

Japan

531

100

523

91

498

102

Korea

522

90

547

93

556

88

Luxembourg

486

97

490

93

479

100

Mexico

410

81

406

85

410

96

Netherlands

525

96

531

89

507

97

New Zealand

530

107

522

93

521

105

Norway

487

96

490

92

484

105

Poland

498

90

495

87

508

100

Portugal

474

89

466

91

472

99

Slovak Republic

488

93

492

95

466

105

Spain

488

91

480

89

461

89

Sweden

503

94

502

90

507

98

Switzerland

512

99

530

97

499

94

Turkey

424

83

424

93

447

93

United Kingdom

515

107

495

89

495

102

United States

489

106

474

90

m

m

     OECD total

491

104

484

98

484

107

     OECD average

500

95

498

92

492

99

Partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

Argentina

391

101

381

101

374

124

Azerbaijan

382

56

476

48

353

70

Brazil

390

89

370

92

393

102

Bulgaria

434

107

413

101

402

118

Chile

438

92

411

87

442

103

Colombia

388

85

370

88

385

108

Croatia

493

86

467

83

477

89

Estonia

531

84

515

80

501

85

Hong Kong-China

542

92

547

93

536

82

Indonesia

393

70

391

80

393

75

Israel

454

111

442

107

439

119

Jordan

422

90

384

84

401

94

Kyrgyzstan

322

84

311

87

285

102

Latvia

490

84

486

83

479

91

Liechtenstein

522

97

525

93

510

95

Lithuania

488

90

486

90

470

96

Macao-China

511

78

525

84

492

77

Montenegro

412

80

399

85

392

90

Qatar

349

84

318

91

312

109

Romania

418

81

415

84

396

92

Russian Federation

479

90

476

90

440

93

Serbia

436

85

435

92

401

92

Slovenia

519

98

504

89

494

88

Chinese Taipei

532

94

549

103

496

84

Thailand

421

77

417

81

417

82

Tunisia

386

82

365

92

380

97

Uruguay

428

94

427

99

413

121

 

RE: Asian-White IQ variance from PISA results
Monday, July 6, 2009 4:20 AM
From:
To: e-l@yahoogroups.com   (Van Sloan is a group member)
 

According to the PISA 2006 results (above)  I calculated the mean scores and the standard variations of 4 East Asian and 13 white countries. I didn’t take China as only the Pacific Rim Chinese are the East Asians, not all the Chinese. I didn’t take US either as there are also blacks and Hispanics. I took only the wealthy white countries (Austria, Canada, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Sweden, Swiss and UK) versus Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan, Hong-Kong.

 

Whites:

 

Science          sd        Math          sd                    Reading          sd

511                 97       509                 93                   500                 100

 

E.Asians:

 

Science          sd        Math          sd                    Reading          sd

532                 94       542                 95                   522                  89

 

If we compare those 13 white countries with the 4 E.Asian countries the whites have lower scores and variances for math.

 

They have a slightly larger variance in science but are never able to catch the East Asians even at the highest end of the scale.

 

The reading scores of the whites are significantly lower but their variance is also significantly larger. They are able to catch the East Asians at only 2 sigma which is the equivalent of 130 IQ at sd=15.

 

Reading correlates more with math than vocabulary. It is also worth seeing the vocabulary scores of the nations but regarding the PISA scores I couldn’t see the famous verbal superiority of the whites against the East Asians. Nothing even close to it! La Griffe Du Lion says in his web site that the whites have 4 points (!) of verbal advantage. Why don’t we see it in the PISA tests?

 

Deniz

 

 

Go to: Average IQ in the US and in 80 other nations

 

Go to: Causes of IQ differences among races and nations

 

Go to: Success of Nations - causes besides IQ

 

     Comments to: VanSloan@yahoo.com