Corruption Perceptions Index 2003

The CPI 2003 Score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people, academics and risk analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt). A total of 15 surveys were used from nine independent institutions, and at least three surveys were required for a country to be included in the CPI.

Go to: National IQ differences - likely causes

Go to: Other success factors for nations and individuals

CPI

Countries - listed in order from least to most corrupt in 2003, as perceived by others

Corruption Perception Index 2003 from:

http://www.transparency.org/

cpi/2003/cpi2003.en.html

GDP/ capita 2002 with Purchasing Power Parity from:

http://www.worldfactsandfigures.com/

gdp_country_desc.php

Average IQ in the nation from:

http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/

article_intelligence/t4.htm

Degree of Development

Finland

9.7

26,200

97

Developed

Iceland

9.6

25,000

98

Developed

New Zealand

9.5

20,200

100

Developed

Denmark

9.5

29,000

98

Developed

Singapore

9.4

24,000

100

Developed

Sweden

9.3

25,700

101

Developed

Netherlands

8.9

26,900

102

Developed

Australia

8.8

27,000

98

Developed

Switzerland

8.8

31,700

101

Developed

Norway

8.8

31,800

98

Developed

United Kingdom

8.7

25,700

100

Developed

Canada

8.7

29,400

97

Developed

Luxembourg

8.7

44,000

101

Developed

Hong Kong

8.0

26,000

107

Developed

Austria

8.0

27,700

102

Developed

Germany

7.7

26,600

102

Developed

Belgium

7.6

29,000

100

Developed

Ireland

7.5

30,500

93

Developed

United States

7.5

37,600

98

Developed

Chile

7.4

10,000

93

Developed

Israel

7.0

19,000

94

Developed

Japan

7.0

28,000

105

Developed

Spain

6.9

20,700

99

Developed

France

6.9

25700

98

Developed

Portugal

6.6

18,000

95

Developed

Oman

6.3

8,200

83

Developing

Bahrain

6.1

14,000

83

Developed

Cyprus

6.1

15,000

92

Developed

Botswana

5.7

9,500

72

Developing

Taiwan

5.7

18,000

104

Developed

Qatar

5.6

21,500

78

Developed

Uruguay

5.5

7,600

96

Developing

Estonia

5.5

10,900

97

Developed

Kuwait

5.3

15,000

83

Developed

Italy

5.3

25,000

102

Developed

Malaysia

5.2

9,300

92

Developing

United Arab Emirates

5.2

22,000

83

Developed

Tunisia

4.9

6,500

84

Developing

Hungary

4.8

13,300

99

Developed

Namibia

4.7

6,900

72

Developing

Lithuania

4.7

8,400

97

Developing

Cuba

4.6

2,300

85

Underdeveloped

Jordan

4.6

4,300

87

Developing

Trinidad and Tobago

4.6

9,500

80

Developing

Belize

4.5

4,900

83

Developing

Saudi Arabia

4.5

10,500

83

Developed

South Africa

4.4

10,000

72

Developed

Mauritius

4.4

11,000

81

Developed

Costa Rica

4.3

8,500

91

Developing

Greece

4.3

19,000

92

Developed

Korea, South

4.3

19,400

106

Developed

Belarus

4.2

8,000

96

Developing

Bulgaria

3.9

6,600

93

Developing

Brazil

3.9

7,600

87

Developing

Czech Republic

3.9

15,300

97

Developed

Jamaica

3.8

3,900

72

Developing

Latvia

3.8

8,300

97

Developing

El Salvador

3.7

4,700

84

Developing

Peru

3.7

4,800

90

Developing

Colombia

3.7

6,500

88

Developing

Croatia

3.7

8,800

90

Developing

Slovakia

3.7

12,200

96

Developed

Mexico

3.6

9,000

87

Developing

Poland

3.6

9,500

99

Developing

Syria

3.4

3,500

87

Underdeveloped

Sri Lanka

3.4

3,700

81

Underdeveloped

China

3.4

4,400

100

Developing

Panama

3.4

6,000

84

Developing

Ghana

3.3

2,100

71

Underdeveloped

Egypt

3.3

3,900

83

Developing

Morocco

3.3

3,900

85

Developing

Dominican Republic

3.3

6,100

84

Developing

Thailand

3.3

6,900

91

Developing

Senegal

3.2

1,500

64

Underdeveloped

Turkey

3.1

6,900

90

Developing

Mali

3.0

860

68

Underdeveloped

Armenia

3.0

3,800

93

Developing

Lebanon

3.0

5,400

86

Developing

Iran

3.0

7,000

84

Developing

Malawi

2.8

670

71

Underdeveloped

India

2.8

2,540

81

Underdeveloped

Romania

2.8

7,000

94

Developing

Mozambique

2.7

1,000

72

Underdeveloped

Russia

2.7

9,300

96

Developing

Madagascar

2.6

760

79

Underdeveloped

Yemen

2.6

840

83

Underdeveloped

Nicaragua

2.6

2,500

84

Underdeveloped

Algeria

2.6

5,300

84

Developing

Tanzania

2.5

630

72

Underdeveloped

Ethiopia

2.5

750

63

Underdeveloped

Zambia

2.5

890

77

Underdeveloped

Gambia

2.5

1,800

64

Underdeveloped

Pakistan

2.5

2,000

81

Underdeveloped

Philippines

2.5

4,200

86

Developing

Albania

2.5

4,500

90

Developing

Argentina

2.5

10,200

96

Developed

Vietnam

2.4

2,250

96

Underdeveloped

Uzbekistan

2.4

2,500

87

Underdeveloped

Moldova

2.4

2,500

95

Underdeveloped

Guatemala

2.4

3,700

79

Underdeveloped

Venezuela

2.4

5,500

88

Developing

Kazakhstan

2.4

6,300

93

Developing

Sudan

2.3

1,420

72

Underdeveloped

Zimbabwe

2.3

2,400

66

Underdeveloped

Bolivia

2.3

2,500

85

Underdeveloped

Honduras

2.3

2,600

84

Underdeveloped

Ukraine

2.3

4,500

96

Developing

Macedonia

2.3

5,000

93

Developing

Sierra Leone

2.2

550

64

Underdeveloped

Uganda

2.2

1,260

73

Underdeveloped

Iraq

2.2

2,400

87

Underdeveloped

Ecuador

2.2

3,100

80

Underdeveloped

Cote d'Ivoire

2.1

1,500

71

Underdeveloped

Papua New Guinea

2.1

2,300

84

Underdeveloped

Kyrgyzstan

2.1

2,800

87

Underdeveloped

Libya

2.1

7,400

84

Developing

Kenya

1.9

1,020

72

Underdeveloped

Indonesia

1.9

2,900

89

Underdeveloped

Tajikistan

1.8

1,250

87

Underdeveloped

Angola

1.8

1,600

69

Underdeveloped

Cameroon

1.8

1,700

70

Underdeveloped

Georgia

1.8

3,100

93

Underdeveloped

Azerbaijan

1.8

3,500

87

Underdeveloped

Myanmar

1.6

1,660

86

Underdeveloped

Paraguay

1.6

4,200

85

Developing

Haiti

1.5

1,700

72

Underdeveloped

Nigeria

1.4

875

67

Underdeveloped

Bangladesh

1.3

1,700

81

Underdeveloped

Albania

?

4500

90

Underdeveloped

Palestine: Gaza

West Bank

?

?

600

800

87 (Jordan)

87 (Jordan)

Underdeveloped

Underdeveloped

The last three areas have very high corruption. They are noteworthy because the corruption and income of their neighboring countries is significantly different. These differences fuel the ongoing despair and violence in these regions.

This chart and correlations on this page were done by Parhatsathid (Ted) Napatalung of Thailand. Questions on this page should be sent to Ted at parhat@yahoo.com . Click for Ted's basic analysis of the causes of corruption or details of how corruption hurts Nigeria. Or click to read his comments on what the numbers on this page mean. Low corruption (high 1st column scores above) shows a very high 0.89 correlation to income, while the correlation of IQ to income is a bit lower at 0.67.

For another interesting contribution by Professor Ted to this website, see The Apprentice TV show and SQ skills

Developed Countries Correlation Coefficients

If integrity is already high, improvement in integrity takes an even greater importance.

IQ to GDP

Corrupt to GDP

IQ to Corrupt

GDP

0.5847804

0.723046008

0.557679697

Log GDP

0.5888812

0.709619697

Developing Countries Correlation Coefficients

If integrity is medium, IQ takes equal importance to integrity.

IQ to GDP

Corrupt to GDP

IQ to Corrupt

GDP

0.6096047

0.574192128

0.206513484

Log GDP

0.6863854

0.612479943

Underdeveloped Countries Correlation Coefficients

If integrity is low, IQ takes a great importance towards GDP.

IQ to GDP

Corrupt to GDP

IQ to Corrupt

GDP

0.6031906

0.232614825

0.149918456

Log GDP

0.6901287

0.167734259

Also on this topic: Corruption, Income Distribution, and Growth from http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v12y2000i2p155-182.html This paper uses an encompassing framework developed by Murphy et al. (1991, 1993) to study corruption and how it affects income distribution and growth. We find that (1) corruption affects income distribution in an inverted U-shaped way, (2) corruption alone also explains a large proportion of the Gini differential across developing and industrial countries, and (3) after correcting for measurement errors, corruption seems to retard economic growth. But the effect is far less pronounced than the one found in Mauro (1995). Moreover, corruption alone explains little of the continental growth differentials. In countries where the asset distribution is less equal, corruption is associated with a smaller increase in income inequality and a larger drop in growth rates.

Go to: Nation rankings on business competitiveness

Go to: Happiness of various nations

Comments to: VanSloan@yahoo.com

Read the ongoing dialog between Sloan and viewers of this website

Google
 
Web SQ.4mg.com (this website, 170+ pages on IQ and Success skills)

The ads below are placed by Google.com - they are not necessarily endorsed by this site